I'm trying to evaluate an organic shape to it's nominal and having trouble with the actual calculation. I've been able to get the heatmap overlay via Surface Comparisons On CAD but haven't found a way to generate the actual calculation I'm looking for. Specifically I want to find how much of the part (%) is within a user defined tolerance. 

Any help would be greatly appreciated. 

I would like to generate a Surface Comparison of  an area on a CAD part against different Actual parts, without having the operator influence every time (i.e., having to manually select it in red before generating the Surface Comparison).

Therefore, I am looking for a solution that allows me to mark (or segment) an area on a CAD part, kind of making it a new object (or area) that would be ´pre defined´ every time I upload an Actual Part. 

Would anyone have tried it or know about any possibility to make it possible?

Best regards

Bruna

I am trying to inspect surface point by exporting i, j, k not only x, y, z. I only could see I-tech has x, y, z from drop down list.
Does it Dnx, Dny, Dnz?

Would someone could help me? 

Thanks,

I have 2 scans of a part, they are before and after of a process. I want to assess the ovality of the part after the process. Can anyone help me to do this?

I want to calculate the difference between two diameters and other basic calculations, but I can’t find any manual explaining how to work with these “formulas”. Is there any way to learn how to perform these simple calculations?

I suspect the correct path is: Inspection → Check dimensions → Others → Defined by user… or Defined by user (scalar), but I’m stuck at this point.... 

will man einen Schnittpunkt einer Linie mit dem CAD erzeugen, so muss man die entsprechende Schnittpunkt-Nr. angeben.
Hier im Beispiel ist das der Punkt Nr. 7.

Macht man nun referenzierte Konstruktion will die SW den entsprechenden IST-Schnittpunkt auch an Nr. 7 erzeugen. DAS CAD hat allerdings Innenflächen, die im IST nicht gemessen sind. Somit ist der richtige IST-Schnittpunkt nicht die Nr. 7 sondern wie in meinem Beispiel die Nr. 5

Meiner Meinung nach könnte das Problem behoben werden, wenn die Software die Schnittpunkte vom Startpunkt der Linie aus zählen würde.
Im Beispiel wäre das dann jeweils der Punkt Nr. 1.

Hab ich etwas übersehen, dass das bereits geht oder könnte man das implementieren?

Danke und viele Grüße
Martin Krüger

mir ist bei der Messung eines Teils ein Problem aufgefallen. An einem Bolzen messe ich zwei Kreise die 1,4mm voneinander entfernt sind. Beim Auswerten der Konzentrizität ist mir aufgefallen, dass die Werte deutlich voneinander abweichen. Bei beiden Messungen habe ich jeweils den anderen Kreis als Bezug verwendet. Ich frage mich nun ob das sein kann und wenn ja warum das so ist.

Ich freue mich auf Eure Kommentare

Also, how do I get the inspection report, I can't seem to find any information in the book on what the proper steps are.

Thanks in advance.

Im trying to compare a surface profile (GDnT) but I have a few problems. I have to do the comparaison on the whole surface of the part (not only on one element like a plan or something else), so after the alignement, I created my reference surface on the CAD but I can't assign any measuring principle : I can't even select the mesh and 'fitting element' does not work correctly.

You can see my CAD in the first pic, then my 3d scan and my nominal surface.

There are multiple GD&T and measurements.
Is there an easy way to do this?

I have mesh/CAD comparison of a certain part. In this deviation analysis I can clearly see the deviating areas but what I am trying to do is to mark deviation where we have a sharp angle deviation from the surface. Does anyone know if this is possible? 

You can see in the image where we have this deviation but I don't know if this is sharp enough or not. Any tool that would give me that measure?

I am currently working on a correlation study between a Scancobot with Atos Q and a CMM using Calypso. We are measuring a radius section of 194 mm on a honeycomb part.

We have observed differences in the measurements obtained from both pieces of equipment. Specifically, we are measuring three sections at different heights, over an approximate length of 15 mm, with 7 points per section.

On the Scancobot, we use a touch point edge measurement with an edge height of 4 mm. On the CMM, we measure the same points but use a 2.5 mm radius probe.

We have noticed that the point-to-point variation is greater on the Scancobot than on the CMM. The dispersion between points on the CMM is about 0.01–0.03 mm, whereas on the Scancobot it is 0.04–0.07 mm.

Do you have any recommendations for measuring this type of part?

Thanks.

I'm currently comparing a CAD file and a mesh, and when I try to create datums points, I click on different planes on my CAD, but they all show up as "not computed" Do you know why? How can I fix this?

In all the videos I've watched, no one seems to have this problem

I would like to figure out, if its possible to create 12 uniformly distributed points on a surface along a circle of Ø75,5mm.

I'd be very happy if there is anyone, who can help my finding a solution.

Best regards

Dominik Walle

I’ll give you some context:
I’m working on a scientific study on oral wound healing. We use an intraoral scanner to compare two different surgical techniques, evaluating how quickly the wound closes over time.

The workflow is: scan patients at different postoperative time points, identify the wound area on each scan, measure the area and track how it changes over time

The scanner exports STL, PLY and OBJ files. I usually work with PLY because the color information helps me better identify the margins. However, I’ve tried all three formats and the issue persists, so I don’t think the file type is the problem.

What i'm doing:

• Import the mesh into Zeiss Inspect
• Draw a closed curve around the wound area on the mesh
• Try to calculate the area inside that curve

The Problem: I cannot find any tool that lets me measure the surface area enclosed by the curve. The curve is definitely closed, the mesh should be closed as well (no visible holes), I’ve looked through the available measurement tools but can’t find a way to compute the area within the boundary. As a comparison, I tried the same workflow in MeshLab, and it works there without issues. I'll add a screenshot of what i've to measure, i can provide you more screenshots etc etc....

I’d really prefer to stay in Zeiss Inspect since I’m already using it for additional 3D and vertical analyses, and it would be ideal to keep everything in one software.

Is there a way in Zeiss Inspect to calculate the area enclosed by a curve drawn on a mesh?
Am I missing a specific function or workflow?

Thanks in advance to anyone who can point me in the right direction, i'm sure i'm missing some stupid passages....