Ich habe zwar im Installation Pfad bei Zeiss welche gefunden aber nicht die richtige.

Vielen Dank für eure Hilfe.

Ich muss an einem Bauteil ein Lochbild messen, das aus mehreren Bohrungen Ø 0,4mm besteht.

Die DuraMax lässt nur Taster mit einer Kugel-Ø 0,3mm zu, laut Info Zeiss.

Welche Einstellungen / Parameter sollte ich vornehmen, um die Vermessung möglich zu machen?

Example conditions below:

• 3 place decimals: +/-.005
• 2 place decimals: +/-.01
• Angles: +/- 1.0

I have a part with four radii, 45° spacing on a Ø6.62 periphery of the radii.

Creating a BC from the center of each radii, easy-peasy.

How do I get the periphery diameter?

Up until Calypso 7.6, which was calypso 2023, you could get the latest license, and it will still work with previous versions. so if i updated from 2019 to 2021, i could use 2021 and 2019.

When i tried updating the license to 2024, i got a message saying it would no longer be backward compatible. so i wouldn't be able to use my CMM with 2019 and 2021.

So i never did.

is that still the case?

I have a CMM with 2019 still and another with 2021. I don't want to upgrade those licenses and then not have access to those CMMs.

I gotta go through some red tape to get them upgraded which is why that cant happen at this moment. but upgrading the 2019 to 2021 shouldn't be an issue. 

but that is my question. i want to upgrade the license for 2019(7.0) to 2021(7.2) but it only is giving the option to update to 8.0 and i don't know if its backward compatible.

Thank You,

Nixon Uruchima

As much of CALYPSO still dates back to the 1990s, when IT was simply a tool and usually worked, I’m hoping for the standard functionality of that era.
Virtually every piece of software (even CATIA...) could be controlled or enhanced via environment variables. One example is the batch files, which still work well as user exits.

Now I would like to trigger a user input via one of these batch files, *calculation_end.bat*. I would then like to use this input – for example, a name – as a log header variable in a PiWeb log. We do not have PCM, which is probably the biggest limitation for such functionality.

So is there a way to get an environment variable into PiWeb somehow?
e.g. Zaphod_Beeblebrox=42  as environment variable

Best Regards
Karsten

ich hatte kürzlich ein Update von Version 6.8 auf Version 8.0.
Der Techniker von Zeiss sagte ich solle einfach dazu installieren.

Aber jetzt hab ein wenig durcheinander. Jetzt werden zwei verschiedene Ordner verwendet:

C:\Users\Public\Documents\Zeiss\CALYPSO
und
C:\Users\Public\Documents\Zeiss\CALYPSO 8.0

Kann ich Version 6.8 einfach deinstallieren ohne etwas zu verlieren? Bzw. wie ist da die richtige Vorgehensweise?

The equipment began exhibiting a spontaneous fault during measurement operations, without any prior hardware or software intervention.

The head performs all indexing movements normally, indicating that the RDS positioning system appears to be functioning correctly.

However, when a measurement begins, the VAST XXT sensor fails to trigger (detect contact with the workpiece) at any A=180° position.
The machine continues to advance past the expected contact point as if the sensor remained inactive preventing point acquisition.

Observed conditions

* The issue occurs with any stylus configuration at A=180°.
* The sensor does not trigger during measurement.
* Head indexing proceeds normally.
* No collisions were identified immediately prior to the fault's onset.
* The fault occurred spontaneously.

I would like to know if anyone has encountered similar behavior and what additional procedures are recommended to isolate the cause before replacing the sensor or opening a service ticket.

I am new to Calypso Zeiss.I am busy with dmis export of the measured points and i want to use a very specific header.Is it possible to modify header fields according to my needs.I mean i want that the header uses whatever fields i give.For example of one field

PR(1)=12345678

Thank you in advance.

The only way I could think to fixture it is by mounting it with a screw onto a milled down scrap part. (see photo)

But now I am struggling with how to align it for the following reasons:

No flat spot on part to use as a Z zero

I have never tried using a torus as the X and Y zero. Is this even allowed, and if so, are there any special considerations when doing this?

I don't know what kind of strategy to use on a torus. Just a bunch of random points?

I considered using the shoulder of the fixture as the Z zero and the cylinder on the fixture below the part as the  and Y Zero. I believe I would then have to make a secondary alignment using features of the actual part in order to get the angle of the indent features, but that takes me back to the original problem. 

I was going to clock it to the dimple, but it is very small and I don't know how to probe it. Is there a better way to clock it? If I did want to clock the dimple, how would I do that when the probe hardly fits inside? Is there a way to have the probe find the center of the dimple like it does when you are setting the probe rack location?

Contura with XXT. I only have base Calypso. No curve or freeform. 

We encountered an odd issue on one of our workstations that operates Calypso that is connected to a CMM. One morning out of nowhere some of the text/font in our windows does not look like it should or does not look like all of the other workstations that we run Calypso on (3 online, 3 offline.) The issue primarily impacts the initial start window, the automatic stylus window, and a handful of other windows. I have tried changing the default font settings within the Calypso 'system settings: Environment' but it has no impact on correcting the issue regardless of whether we have "Calypso Standard" or "From System Settings" selected. I have also played around with the screen resolution, and a handful of other windows settings, but have run out of ideas as to how to fix the problem. I have even tried to install a different version of Calypso and the issue transfers over. If anyone has encountered the issue or may have any ideas on a system setting to change please let me know.

The first two images below are what "normal" or what it "should" look like is. The second two images are the same windows from the problem machine. As you can see it is a bit of an issue in the automatic stylus changer window as the stylus names are covered up by the changer positions so you can't really tell what stylus system is in what position unless the operator is highly familiar with the systems and positions...

"BAD/INCORRECT FONT/TEXT BELOW"

There have been changes to the technical drawing and a D reference has been added.

Along with this, the runout value has also changed.
I need to check the runout based on 2 plane points and one cylinder point.

In Calyso, I can select 2 references for runout: 1 plane and 1 cylinder.
I haven't seen 2 different plane points for runout before.

I'm using Calyso 2021.

Could this be related to the new GD&T?

Benim düşüncem,