[An...] Posted June 10, 2022 Share Posted June 10, 2022 ___ Link to comment https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/10186-positionstoleranz-und-abbildung-9-14/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted June 13, 2022 Share Posted June 13, 2022 As far as i could understand from translated texts: Don't mix True position with Perpendicularity They allow max deviation of 0,15 on one of ends of cylinder axis in case of 0,0 perpendicularity For max diameter ( 50,16 ) they allow max perpendicularity of 0,16 - and they are allowing bonus for True position ( 0,3 + 0,16 ) (M) in True position is not bad use here, but it can be without that bonus. If OD ( base B ) is inserted to somewhere, then it needs True position. But that is another part with another drawing. Link to comment https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/10186-positionstoleranz-und-abbildung-9-14/#findComment-48634 Share on other sites More sharing options...
[An...] Posted June 21, 2022 Author Share Posted June 21, 2022 ___ Link to comment https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/10186-positionstoleranz-und-abbildung-9-14/#findComment-48636 Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted June 21, 2022 Share Posted June 21, 2022 OK, so again - don't compare Perpendicularity with True position. True position covers: Two coordinates ( here can be X and Y ) of both ends of cylinder from center of cylinder B The ID cylinder can be non-concentric with cyl B and still can be perpendicular to base A Partial perpendicularity case ( in case cylinder is concentric with cyl B ) For ASME I don't know anything about RAME/UAME, but handleing (M) is covered by Calypso. Both callouts are evaluated independently of each other. Link to comment https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/10186-positionstoleranz-und-abbildung-9-14/#findComment-48638 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in