Jump to content

simultaneous requirement implied


---
 Share

Recommended Posts

Please sign in to view this quote.

If you have an FCF without a fully qualified datum (in this example without a tertiary datum), the standard calls for checking all possibilities the incomplete datum allows for. Of course, it's not possible to really check all of them, but you will have to find only one solution where the call-out is in tolerance for the feature to be in spec. Usually, you will do that by doing a best-fit for the undefined degree of freedom, but the method of finding a solution is totally up to you.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, that was my usual practice. I think I conflated a previous comment in his instruction. I misunderstood it to be, the fcf for keyway and fcf for bhc were a simultaneous requirement..simply because fcf had same datum structure.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to view this quote.

I'm slow.. 2374_5462f0709372563777906bfed8c25398.jpg
So ignore the SEP REQ note.. How would I apply a simultaneous requirement in Calypso ? The keys must be clocked nominally to each other, correct ??
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Slots are difficult, but you could either use a Geometry Best Fit with the (4) Planes, or a Free-Form Surface with the (4) Planes. The results "should" be similar.
659_0eb06d514fe7818f254bda39030f4e3e.png
659_6502900eab5cb240e037b429cfde6670.png
659_d915c4543dcfd5ae0f7fe68b7a1f22a1.png
659_66dcd630d05e29edbfaaed1b4a679f15.png
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...