Jump to content

Runout of small groove


---
 Share

Recommended Posts

How would you go about checking the run out of this torus (groove) in the attached drawing. The way I'm currently evaluating the run out is by creating 8 circles along the torus recalled into a circle. The arc of the radius that I'm able to measure with a .5mm L probe is only 60 degrees for my 8 circles on the torus. The size of the radius of the groove is only .045 (Standard) I'm getting some extremely high results that I can't replicate with table inspection (indicator/pin on -D-). Does anyone have any suggestions on how they would approach measuring this feature?

Calypso 2016, Vast XXT, Curve/FF

RUNOUT-HOWSDG.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing you could try first would be to constrain the radius of the circle you are recalling the circles into. Have you tried recalling the circle points into a torus?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for the suggestions. I did try to recall the circles into a torus but when doing so it will not allow me to use it in a runout. When constraining the radius on my recalled circle the run out stayed about the same.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Theoreticaly you can measure torus to get real center and then measure just circle in exact center. This should be enough - no total runout used.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with making an alignment with a torus, measuring R2. Then measuring R1 with a circle.

Also, there have been instances where recalling points does not yield give as accurate a reading.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ideally you'd want to be able to self-center scan around the equator of the donut. That would really only be possible with a rotary table.

Otherwise, I would suggest to measure 7+ arcs of the R2, and construct a circle using recall from the 7+ arcs. You can then use that recall circle inside of the radial runout characteristic.

Tough measurement without a lot of great solutions.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for the suggestions. Measuring the feature as a torus and using that data to measure a circle at the center is the most reliable and stable method of everything I've tried for both size and location. Thank you Martin for the suggestion.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...