Jump to content

Excel vs...


Recommended Posts

Please sign in to view this quote.

Why... 🙁

As a database only, PiWeb Report is so much better.

I used QC-Calc for a couple of years, and it was much better than hand typing results in. The thing that got me was that the database could not handle dynamic measurement plans, so if you had a measurement plan with Mini-Plans, it created a database for each amount of characteristics. It was really frustrating to keep up with all of the data.
Link to comment
https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/13846-excel-vs/#findComment-71480
Share on other sites

I use QC Calc as basically just a compiler. You can set it up to export CSV's of raw data that can then feed that into other systems. If you can do even a little programming then it cleans them up very nice. I then use those cleaned raw data files to feed into RStudio and can output a ton of graphs and analysis very quickly.


I've made that admission that P$ Web is actually better than QC Calc; However, only on an absolute scale. On a value per dollar scale QC Calc beats P$ Web by a mile.

Try and tell management that you need 35K upfront and then a little every year too, just to make your CMM's do what they already do. Just much prettier.
Link to comment
https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/13846-excel-vs/#findComment-71482
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...