[Jo...] Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 Hello everyone, I am currently trying to inspect a part that has rectangular pins on it. I need to get length/Width and location on them. I also need to use the camera (o-inspect 322) because the pins are long, thin, and numerous. My issue is that selecting rectangular path (the only optical strategy) isn't working. no matter the number of points I set, the step width is a negative value. If I set a manual step width, then the number of points becomes negative. The feature won't run if either are negative. Any help is appreciated. Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ri...] Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 Rectangles have an edge backoff. Make sure you have the correct length for your lines. See the screenshot below.Untitled.png Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Jo...] Posted October 27, 2020 Author Share Posted October 27, 2020 Changing the lengths to nominal value changes the number but they remain negative. I've used rectangular paths without issue before but this is my first time using the optics with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ri...] Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 Post a screenshot of just the feature window itself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Jo...] Posted October 27, 2020 Author Share Posted October 27, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Th...] Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 If I'm reading these right, you have a square rectangle 0.025(units) to a side. If that's the case, you need to dial your edge stops in the measuring strategy way down, as moving in 0.025(units) from each edge leaves you with less than no measurable area. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Jo...] Posted October 27, 2020 Author Share Posted October 27, 2020 AH! Yes, thank you very much. I was reading this effectively as a search distance, not as a "stop this far from the edge" distance. Simply misunderstood what I was actually changing and ended up creating a search distance in the negative. Solved now. Thank you for the help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in