[Da...] Posted September 3, 2020 Share Posted September 3, 2020 No model. the question mark has a +/-.001" tolerance. we'll use 14 degrees for the basic angle. as a bonus the ID chamfer is a 45 .01 x .01 how would you get that ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ri...] Posted September 3, 2020 Share Posted September 3, 2020 Why.... Just why.... Why do people have to make things so complicated. It's a Cone... give me the diameter, angle and where it intersects with Datum A. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Da...] Posted September 3, 2020 Author Share Posted September 3, 2020 Dammed enginerds!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ri...] Posted September 3, 2020 Share Posted September 3, 2020 If you intersected the cone with the bottom face, then traced a line on the cone, and then created a perpendicular between the two, would that not be what you are looking for? Hard to check work without the nominals of what I'm looking for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Da...] Posted September 3, 2020 Author Share Posted September 3, 2020 That'll work ! I was less elegant. I created a 3d line from the Id cylinder and intersected with the cone shell. Used a bit of trig to fix the Z axis measurement to a perp meas in results element. We also had our Eng. give us a gage point on the surface of the cone... The numbers varied slightly due to the actual angle varied a bit from nominal. The print is projecting a LONG ways to the measurement. I totally agree WHY !!! 🤣 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted October 4, 2020 Share Posted October 4, 2020 the practice is much easier here than the theory. great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in