Jump to content

Flat on Slot with MMC


Recommended Posts

Please sign in to view this quote.

Ugh I hate seeing this done this way. The drawing is actually incorrect. That is why you are having a hard time figuring out how to handle it. Position is only for features of size. Because the feature that it is applied to is just some distance between center points, no size can be determined per Y14.5 (i.e. Rule #1). If you can speak with the engineer about it I would. There's no way to actually determine the tolerance zone based on the MMC modifier because that would depend on whether it is an internal feature or external feature of size. Because it is neither, I don't know how you can even utilize MMC.
Link to comment
https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/15060-flat-on-slot-with-mmc/#findComment-80604
Share on other sites

Please sign in to view this quote.

Until there is a "GD&T Checker" like a spell checker, expect these things to never go away. Why CAD software packages haven't utilized this is beyond me.

At the end of the day, you can bring it up to the design engineer, but be prepared to hear, "can you just do it any ways".
Link to comment
https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/15060-flat-on-slot-with-mmc/#findComment-80606
Share on other sites

Please sign in to view this quote.

I agree 100%. When I worked for a manufacturing facility, I always enjoyed being involved in the quoting process, so that I could review drawings, and iron out any technical questions prior to making the first part. It just made things smoother along the way.

It just became a headache at times because one T1 supplier would want things evaluated this way, and another T1 supplier would want things evaluated a different way.

I could show you some drawings that are either ISO or even ASME that will make your head hurt. I know that I've had a few drinks because of them. Lol.
Link to comment
https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/15060-flat-on-slot-with-mmc/#findComment-80610
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...