Jump to content

Runout and datum D


Recommended Posts

Please sign in to view this quote.

I'm only familiar with runout to a single datum (axial).

How would the measurement be different if datum D were the primary datum, and C wasn't included? In the figure, does the plane normal define the direction of the axis, but the midpoint of D define the center of rotation?
Link to comment
https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/15068-runout-and-datum-d/#findComment-80664
Share on other sites

I'm only familiar with runout to a single datum (axial).

How would the measurement be different if datum D were the primary datum, and C wasn't included? In the figure, does the plane normal define the direction of the axis, but the midpoint of D define the center of rotation?
[/quote]

Good question. The answer to your second question is yes. Here is why this is important. Using single axial runout for this example, imagine an axial surface on the end of a shaft. This axial surface is slightly conical in shape rather than flat. If the conicity error of the axial surface is perfectly true to datum D it will not show any runout. Any radial displacement of the axis of rotation from there would cause an increase in the observed axial runout due to the conicity error. In this case the error caused would be eliptical in shape (cross section of a cone).
Link to comment
https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/15068-runout-and-datum-d/#findComment-80666
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...