Jump to content

Profile


Recommended Posts

Hi,
Need help getting the profile to a dimension. I am very new to the curve feature and was wondering if anyone could help.
I scan the bottom side of that feature as a 3d curve.
Then i recall that feature using free form surface.
Then i create the profile characteristic and choose the free form surface which recalls the 3d curve. I choose Datum A as the datum. 3033_99b5652f76763f00ace980459957e8f1.png
3033_61026e77b7d7d62b6db635f0403a1adc.png
I get around .020.
I am not sure which option to choose in the bilateral section. Or would it even mater? Hopefully someone can help with this. Zeiss created a program that checks this dimension and it comes out within spec on their program. Just wondering what i am doing wrong.

Thank You
Link to comment
https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/16096-profile/
Share on other sites

Hi.

Couple things:
The way you have done it sounds like 1 correct method.
This DRF (Datum A only) I don't think this fully constrains this profile, but anyhow...
"-A- only DRF" does allow rotational best fit (and perhaps translation - but DRF does not appear complete.)
Technically if the profile is A<---->B The (R.08) should probably be basic.
Feel free to share this info with Eng Dept and ask them for a second look.
Are you measuring this a 3D surface 360° around the part? I'm not sure if we're looking at a cutout view or the entire actual side view of the part.
If Zeiss programmed this, I assume it's mostly correct. 3D curve is considered the 'black arts' of CMM. Be sure to copy their scan settings and most importantly all evaluation settings. I would try to copy their feature from the other program directly if possible.
Also, if recalling into FFS, you can also just slice the CAD model and create a FFS and bypass the 3D curve. With some features, it makes it easier to define scan path by using 3D Curve first.
As a sanity check, you could measure the 2 planes (and the R.08 if feasible), and the max value of those 2 shouldn't be much more than what you get with FFS.

As far as the bilateral-one result. Yes that is correct evaluation method.


Good luck!
Link to comment
https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/16096-profile/#findComment-89116
Share on other sites

A common mistake made when learning curve is the number of measured points to number of evaluation points. When you create your curve in CAD-Create Features, The Default number of points is 100. If you create a curve with 100 points, then you want to have at least 3 times that many points in the the strategy of the curve. That is the first thing I would check.
Link to comment
https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/16096-profile/#findComment-89118
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...