[Ke...] Posted January 28, 2020 Share Posted January 28, 2020 [img][/img] Hey guys & gals, Given that ASME Y14.5-2018 was released for purchase about a year ago, I was wondering who (if anyone) works for a company that has transitioned to the latest revision of the standard (Yes or No?) For those who have, what is your answer for the "Single Solution Datum" for a single plane, multiple datum target planes (e.g. A1,A2,A3, etc), and offset multiple datum target planes. Thanks 🙂 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ja...] Posted January 28, 2020 Share Posted January 28, 2020 Y14.5.1 - 2020(?) has yet to be released so anything that people are doing to circumvent this is in violation of the standard, unless you find somebody with a draft of the new 14.5.1 and they have developed a constrained least squares fitting algorithm that is appropriate. I am curious as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ke...] Posted January 28, 2020 Author Share Posted January 28, 2020 I guess I should have dug a little deeper to see if Y14.5.1 had been released, as my source indicated it would. 😃 To be fair, it looks like, for a single A Datum plane, one could theoretically use physical shims for orientation, but that would be hella-tedious for multiple part inspection 🤣 ...Perhaps, the Single Solution Datum method would not apply to multiple Datum A pads, as it would be unlikely to produce a convex form from them(?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ri...] Posted January 28, 2020 Share Posted January 28, 2020 Nothing like releasing a new way to measure/interpret something, but saying to wait a couple of years for the full explanation. I would say that most people refer to the 1994 definition either way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in