Jump to content

Profile result not repeating


---
 Share

Recommended Posts

Part is a cylinder fixtured horizontally facing Y+. It has 4 slots (.141 x .275) 90° apart around the OD at one end. There is a
surface profile callout of .015 to A & B for each slot. A is the main cylinder, B is the rear flat end of the cylinder. Base alignment
is A spatial Y+ and X& Z origins. B is the Y origin. Planar Z+ is the slot at the top (12:00 position) using a symmetry point.

We are doing a type 1 Gage R&R. The slot profile is not repeating. Currently I am using a secondary alignment (A spatial Y+, -
Z & X origin, B is Y origin) Any ideas as to why this is not repeating? I also tried using the A&B features themselves in the profile characteristic, but that didn't repeat either.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on your description it appears that the slots have simultaneous requirements and should be Best Fit as a rotational pattern to -A-. No one slot takes precedence over another so they need to be checked as a pattern. This should help your results, although I don't know if it's related to your repeatability issue. Just an observation.

Robert
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If by best fit you mean the best fit option under evaluation?
My understanding is that this can only be used if the profile
is form only with no datum reference?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you looped your alignment ? Check your workholding ! Most of the time for me, it comes down to workholding. When I get desperate ,I'll put a tenth indicator on the part and touch it lightly with my finger, If it moves at all, you lose ! 🤣
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Dave. Program is looped at 3 iterations with a .0005 tolerance.
The fixture uses a magnetic v block and toe clamp, very secure.

I just added a hole in the fixture below the two vertical slots, so I can orient
the part using a gage pin that I can slide it and out. Repeats much better now.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to view this quote.

If this is what I think it is: you would use the "Alignment from several curves" alignment feature to establish your pattern fit from the slot features. To then evaluate relative to that alignment, I think you have to copy the features w/ point recall and set them to use that fit.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, so based on my description the slots location/orientation and Datum's A & B,
what do I tick in the way of translation and rotation options inside this option.
150_ece5a30a0957d6eeb3b6ba55ab81e8d9.png
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, I might have gotten ahead of myself here. I made the assumption that these slot features were being checked as curve entities. If they aren't, my suggestion isn't really applicable.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You want to Best Fit all the slots at the same time, not 1 at a time. If you're using curves for the slots then use Thomas' advise and use "Alignment from several curves", select all the slot curves, and allow rotation around Y only. Then copy the curves used for alignment, recall the previous curve points, and check their profile using the alignment you created from the alignment curves.

You can also do this with symmetry planes and/or various other methods. The concept is the same. Measure slots with planes, create symmetry planes, create a Best Fit bore pattern of all 4 symmetry planes allowing rotation only, recall the symmetry planes into new planes, and report their position in the new alignment. Or recall the slots sides and check the profile of the slot sides in the new alignment.

Robert
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You only allow translation/rotation of unconstrained degrees of freedom. The cylinder constrains 4 DOF, the end plane 1 DOF. The only thing left is rotation around Y, which is the only thing you should choose.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...