[Go...] Posted September 16, 2019 Share Posted September 16, 2019 Hello to all, Is it valid to have to adjust the geometry in its X, Y, Z and radius coordinates of a "round head" cylindrical probe after calibration? I understand that if it is a "flat head" cylindrical probe, that adjustment is made only on the Z + axis to make measurements on that axis. What do you think, it is valid to be adjusting the geometry in its X, Y, Z and radius coordinates? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[No...] Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 I don't use that kind of probes but I would say yes. The calibration only gives you the precise size and location of the spherical end, but the cylinder axis could still be slightly tilted. So if you want to probe with the part above the sphere you need to compensate for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Is...] Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 I´m not an expert in cylinder probes but I wouldn't modify any qualification value, if I detect something irregular in those numbers normally is related with the quality-design of the probe or a wrong qualification strategy. I wouldn't use the flat area of the cilinder to measure because the perpendicular limitations. for round head cylinder is possible to have one qualification for the cylinder and anhoter one for the sphere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Go...] Posted September 22, 2019 Author Share Posted September 22, 2019 Hello, Thanks for your comments, I will continue to investigate more, basically that kind of geometry is used to measure internal bore diameters or vertices at a certain intersection, the difficult thing is that there are some limitations to having an RDS head and a Vast XXT sensor . Regards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in