[Je...] Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 Per the attached ...If I Use an intersection for the projected datum C do I use a diametral or rectangle set up ? Is this My best method to report this ? Thanks in advance for any suggestions.projection.PNG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 I don't think you need to create an intersection, unless I'm missing something. The projection of -C- can be done in the True Position dialog box. Just click on the P, in a circle, this will allow you to change the projection of the feature -C-. You can even create a theoretical plane at the projected height and select the plane as the projection termination. Mark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Je...] Posted September 4, 2019 Author Share Posted September 4, 2019 Thanks Mark, The problem with this is the projection height is actually zero to datum E. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Aa...] Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 There's obviously a lot to this we're not seeing, but from what we can see, I would say there are problems with this print on multiple levels. First, your question about the shape of the tolerance zone is a very good one. Position FCFs applied to cylindrical features in the standard have cylindrical tolerance zones with two kinds of exceptions: - Bidirectional tolerancing (7.4.4 of 2009) - this would have to be more clearly indicated than in your case, Jerry. - When the DRF consists of only a plane that is parallel to the controlled cylinder - (e.g. Fig. 6-7 - IMO, this is a terrible and confusing example, and the same effect could have been achieved using a cylindrical tolerance zone for the position FCF, since the DRF has so much mobility) Specifying a projected tolerance zone for zero length is very strange. I would assume that C and D are nominally coaxial. Controlling the position of C to C-D seems really strange, too. E doesn't add anything. I'm not sure what "REF" after the 0.01 cylindricity FCF signifies... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Aa...] Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 Jerry, I get what you're saying. Projection height of 0 means they're only trying to control the location at the one end. I guess that should have been obvious to me. 🙄 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Je...] Posted September 4, 2019 Author Share Posted September 4, 2019 I very much agree this print is wrong... I have requested it change many times that We could actually do something useful with the projection. I tried the datum D feature with a projection and it defaulted to a 52mm height...Changing the height to zero didn't work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in