[Iv...] Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 On drawing i have this situation. https://imgbb.com/ The problem is following. Two planes (A3 and A4) are on different heights. I can not find a solution to correctly measure flatness according to the callout. Any idea? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[An...] Posted July 25, 2019 Share Posted July 25, 2019 See attached.Contribution_25_07_2019.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ri...] Posted July 26, 2019 Share Posted July 26, 2019 Per ISO 1101 they should all share the same tolerance zone: All four planes must fit, together, between two parallel planes 0.5mm apart. If they are designed to be at different heights (per the drawing) then the CZ is misapplied. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[An...] Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 Inhouse Standard: THE STEPPED FLATNESS. Perhaps a new feature of CALYPSO in the future? See attached.Contribution_29_07_2019.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[An...] Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 THE STEPPED PLANE. Perhaps a new feature of CALYPSO in the future? See attached.Contribution_29_07_2019_.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Iv...] Posted July 31, 2019 Author Share Posted July 31, 2019 Please sign in to view this quote. Interesting ideas...Perhaps maybe in distant future. All depends on Zeiss on how quickly they adopt new ideas. 😱 But there is possible solution allready there - "Offset Plane". Measured (scaned) plane is offseted to right height (in my case A3 and A4). Offset should not loose any dimension (we need flatness on common zone). Then we could recall feature point and construct new plane (twice offset plane and twice regular plane). Unfortunately recall feture point does not see offseted plane (?), only regular plane is visible. Why is so is beyond me... but that could work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[An...] Posted July 31, 2019 Share Posted July 31, 2019 If I remember well,Offset Plane is a derived feature. It does not include any point data! Please correct me if I am wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Me...] Posted August 2, 2019 Share Posted August 2, 2019 Please sign in to view this quote. While I cannot comment on the "legality" of the callout, what you have shown can now be accomplished using a FreeFrom surface since recent software releases include the minimum fit option. Alternatively, one could offset the measured points using PCM, and recall them into a common plane for the flatness evaluation. Both methods will give the same result. I agree that this type of "feature" should be available, esspecially to simplify the process of creating a single datum feature from multiple offset surfaces. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Da...] Posted August 24, 2019 Share Posted August 24, 2019 Ivan, which of Phillip's suggestions did you try? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in