[Me...] Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 How do you guys go about True Position callouts when the basic dimensions aren't located from the Datum features? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Za...] Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 Call the features back to the correct DRF. Provide the 'basics' they ask for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Me...] Posted November 7, 2018 Author Share Posted November 7, 2018 That's exactly what I've been doing. There have been certain cases where I was able to offset to a location through formulas but I'm unsure if that is an incorrect method or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Za...] Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 at the end of the day, if the customer wants incorrect inspection because of stubbornness or ignorance..that's on them. So long as they pay, right? as far as being correct? if the basics don't match the DRF, then either the DRF is wrong, or the basics are wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Me...] Posted November 7, 2018 Author Share Posted November 7, 2018 I always thought that about the basics being back to the datums but that is incorrect Zach. It's legal according to the standard. I actually made a thread about that a couple years ago and Mark Foster helped/corrected a bunch of us about it. I still hate it though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Za...] Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 right, it is legal. You can basic out anything you want. But if the basics are shown back to features other than the DRF, you don't change your DRF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in