[Ge...] Posted May 14, 2018 Share Posted May 14, 2018 Hello , I have a problem with Rectangle tolerance frame when I measure a true position of a bore pattern. The tolerance frame doesn't rotate with pattern . In the drawing I have tolerance : 0.3 circumferential and 0.5 radial ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Er...] Posted May 14, 2018 Share Posted May 14, 2018 The software is doing exactly what you told it to. 0,5 in Y, and 0,3 in X. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ge...] Posted May 14, 2018 Author Share Posted May 14, 2018 Ok, then I have to reformulate ; how can I do in Calypso the rotate of the tolerance frame ( to follow the Radius and Angle ) ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[An...] Posted May 14, 2018 Share Posted May 14, 2018 _ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ge...] Posted May 15, 2018 Author Share Posted May 15, 2018 Attached !Capture position.PNG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[An...] Posted May 15, 2018 Share Posted May 15, 2018 _ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Mi...] Posted May 15, 2018 Share Posted May 15, 2018 I think he wants to evaluate the tolerances like this.0226_001.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[An...] Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 _ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ge...] Posted May 16, 2018 Author Share Posted May 16, 2018 Thank you very much for your description but I don't think that this it's simple to apply. I think that Zeiss should consider to make some change in this direction . I think that it wood be much simple if I will do a simple True Position of every bore related to center of the ring and just rotate the base alignment, according to the drawing and use Rectangle tolerance frame . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Te...] Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 Is that even a legit call out? Whenever I have seen position without the Ø, it applied to only 1 axis, like position of a slot width. Does that call out really mean a square zone or is it just a bad call out? Just curios.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Aa...] Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 You could consider it an equivalent of what Y14.5 refers to as a bidirectional tolerance, using the polar coordinate method. (See Y14.5-2009 Figure 7-29 and 7.4.4.2.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in