[Ti...] Posted Tuesday at 06:55 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 06:55 PM Zeiss inspect will not let you use MMC for a position check on a non-feature of size. For example, let's say a print calls out a diameter or distance from theoretical sharp corners(TSC), basically the size is some fake diam or distance that is not attached to the real part(see picture). I don't use Calypso, but I'm curious how you all would handle this in that software before I ask for this as a feature request again, it would be nice to say how it is done in calypso and pcdmis. In pcdmis, we can create two opposing points and construct a circle from these points to get a diameter or distance that can be applied towards a position check with MMC bonus. I've tried this numerous times in Zeiss Inspect/GOM and no matter what I do I cannot get the MMC bonus to flow thru into the actual check. At one point I created a curve > circle from curve > back to curve > back to circle and it looked like it was working, but it doesn't flow the bonus thru into the results. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Cl...] Posted Tuesday at 08:53 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 08:53 PM What picture? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ti...] Posted Tuesday at 10:02 PM Author Share Posted Tuesday at 10:02 PM Opps sorry...there are many non-feature of sizes you can dream, but this is one a co-worker just asked me why I didn't apply MMC to it. I can apply MMC though in GOM, I just have to use the user defined area, create a bonus variable, create the center pnt/plane location, then do the math of making sure that the bonus variable plus the stated tolerance is larger than 2x the deviation of the mishit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Pe...] Posted Tuesday at 10:11 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 10:11 PM You can recall the intersection's xyz into two theoretical points, and then set the vector of those points to aim outwards. Then you can recall them into a symmetry point which does allow for MMC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ti...] Posted Tuesday at 11:13 PM Author Share Posted Tuesday at 11:13 PM (edited) Thanks for the reply, interested to hear if there are any other methods you all use. I mentioned this above, but in pcdmis we would create a midpoint from the two intersection points. Then construct a circle using the midpoint as the center and either int point as the radius value. I've tried this exact approach in Zeiss Inspect/GOM and it looks like it works, but it will not allow you to pass along the size of this feature(constructed circle) into the position check. Edited Tuesday at 11:14 PM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted Tuesday at 11:45 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 11:45 PM Here is one method https://cmm-quarterly.squarespace.com/calypso-free-training/calypso-true-position-of-a-slot-with-mmc-formulas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ti...] Posted Wednesday at 03:23 AM Author Share Posted Wednesday at 03:23 AM (edited) Please sign in to view this username. I'm not familiar enough with calypso to understand that workflow, I've never even seen the software. How you could create a circle from two planes is weird to me...I could actually follow this workflow in pcdmis b/c planes in pcdmis also creates a centroid point so you can theoretically create a circle from the midpoint of both planes mid point, and then use one of the centroids as the radial value, but that is not needed....b/c the two planes is a feature of size. I know that this is just an exercise in how to get this done, but I could not follow that workflow at all. Does calypso create a definitive centroid point from a plane so you can derive a point from a plane? Please sign in to view this username. workflow made perfect sense in that you establish a symmetry point(mid point) and two opposing vector directional values and points...that is basically the workflow in pcdmis. In case anyone from GOM reads this thread that is my preferred method to create a size feature from a weird non-feature of size to apply MMC to a positional check. Edited Wednesday at 03:27 AM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ch...] Posted Wednesday at 04:24 AM Share Posted Wednesday at 04:24 AM symmetry plane ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in