Jump to content
Private Messaging is activated - check "How to" on how to disable it ×

End Part Position Ignored in Geometry Re-Qualification Program


---
 Share

Recommended Posts

If you have PCM you can put a positionCMM() command in the post settings for the program.

I actually have positionCMM(450.0,-125.0,-50.0) in an inspection_end_pcm.txt so it runs on all programs so every single one of my programs goes up to a safe place without having to edit the park position in everything. Those values are for a DuraMax to put it near the back right corner of the machine... make sure you know your own measurement volume and adjust the values accordingly. By Default it does Z first, which is likely what you want, but you can force it to run in different orders ( PCM manual explains all that)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have anything in your features (other then theoreticals) that get measured, that should trigger the CNC END PARK POSITION to execute

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to view this quote.

This is one of the best ways to do this and one of my preferred.  The other is to use an inspection_end_pcm.txt to perform a stylus change (typically to masterProbe), which can also be accompanied with a positionCMM(axis,axis,axis,coordinate,coordinate,coordinate) (you can define the order of the axis travel.  Sometimes you want Y to move before X and vice versa)

Michael - If you have any features in your features tab that get measured, this will be enough to trigger the CNC END PARK POSITION

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to view this quote.

I used to use PCM to do a stylus system change in the inspection_end_pcm.txt file, but we ran into issues sometimes with it not behaving properly on some CMMs.  Drove me nuts. Same program on two DuraMax's running the same software, same firmware, 1 serial number digit apart.

1 CMM acted as you expected, did the probe change, then drove to the coded position, the other would drive to the limit of either the X or Y axis at it's current height, then take shortest path to the probe rack. So I gave up on that idea since it was all undocumented code anyway and was questionable benefit having it perform the probe change anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...