[Yt...] Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 Hi Would it be possible to change the reference system for a group of requirements at once, similar to the capability that already exists in the software in the Properties panel to set the tolerance for a group of dimensions at the same time? It would be great to know how this is achieved, and if not, I would be happy to present this as a new and useful option for cases where we wish to examine the impact of different reference systems on a particular requirement. Thank you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Jo...] Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 Hi, Select the actual elements --> Properties --> General --> Alignment required Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Yt...] Posted January 16 Author Share Posted January 16 Hi Thank you very much for your response, but you are referring to a different issue, which is the alignment required to be calculated for creating the element. I asked about something else, which is the datum system required for calculating profile tolerances, for example. I want to examine the measurement result against several reference systems and I would like to be able to make such a change easily and quickly for a group of measurements, all with a single command. Is this possible and currently supported in the software? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Jo...] Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 Ok, I understand your question, but in your case I can't help you, I didn't find a solution 😕 Maybe some developer can help you, I think that's would be a great tool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Na...] Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 Hello, I think separate checks with a new datum system would be the easiest solution. Or you edit the used datum system, so it's based on other datums. -> this would keep report pages with the existing checks intact. A scripting solution is also possible but I'm not aware of another "clickable" solution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Yt...] Posted January 19 Author Share Posted January 19 (edited) Hello Nanno Thanks for your advise. I know these options and now with your explanation, I understand the advantages over my suggestion, although depending on the item development stages, such an option would actually have helped me instead of doubling the dimensions in the measurement program. Thank you very much Edited January 19 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in