[Yt...] Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 Hello I need some help regrading the true position of the element C. According to the drawing I have to inspect to symmetry plane of the slot relating to A|B, but due to the fact that A is perpendicular to C, A|B datum system dose not containing the needed information to provide me a planar tolerance zone, but only a circular one because it is just a point over a plane. What is the best steps that are needed here so I will be able to get a planar tolerance zone? A circular zone contain also the deviation of the 94.5mm and I want to neglect it. As for now, I constructed two rotational planes. First 90 degrees for A around the CAD X axes when the point is B and then 25 degrees around the B axes. In this way I acquired a plane in the appropriate direction, where, although its directions are nominal, its axis of rotation is obtained from actual scanned data. Is this a proper and correct way of operating? Thank you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Yt...] Posted February 27 Author Share Posted February 27 Any comments? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 I am not sure of options on INSPECT, but here you have spatial as plane A and origin as circle B - are you able to fill only whose two elements into TP datums and get result? You can set tolerance to X or Y only, because there is no need for second tolerance ( missing ⌀ so rectangular tolerance band, but here is not used on center, just for symmetry ). Theoreticaly you can do normal alignment where you will use B-C and planar and B as origin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Yt...] Posted March 3 Author Share Posted March 3 I need a planar tolerance zone according to the slot direction so I will be able to control the angular position of this element. The A|B system is just an axis over a plane and it dose not containing this information. I can't construct B-C by C and then check C against itself. So I asked regarding the additional nominal construction needed here for this true-position request. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Jo...] Posted Thursday at 10:08 AM Share Posted Thursday at 10:08 AM Please sign in to view this quote. Why you want neglect it? This is exactly what drawing ask you to evaluate with true position of datum C. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in