[Vi...] Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 (edited) Edited February 27 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 There can be several problems. From unstable alignment to wrong nominals and moved model ( elements on model does not fit to base alignment ). You need to investigate. Measure inner cylinder ( perpendicular to your tip axis ) to get radius and origin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Vi...] Posted February 27 Author Share Posted February 27 hi Martin, there are 5 holes with different angle 2 running ok 3rd gone inside and base alignment rotated so coordinates also same for all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ch...] Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 Hi Vishal, are the angle (A1 / A2)from your circle right? On your picture the path doesn´t looks parallel to the feature axis?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 Perhaps i see bad, but is that strategy path shown in 2nd picture? That blue "nominal" of circle is ok i think, but strategy can be bad. Not enough of right pictures and not enough of own research. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Vi...] Posted February 28 Author Share Posted February 28 I have made strategies like this I h Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 And that feature alignment ( "Part alignment" ) - or for other circles - is there used only rotation without any features set ( aka empty features, just in special used rotation )? Are all circles same in origin ( aka X and Y )? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Vi...] Posted February 28 Author Share Posted February 28 Only Special used Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 Then it should be fine if X and Y nominals are the same. Does it scan with shaft or it goes to wrong place and you stop that before scan? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Vi...] Posted February 28 Author Share Posted February 28 that need to confirm from operator, i will check and confirm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Da...] Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 You could create a plane from the flat around the hole and then use a formula for the Y position such as getActual(Plane1)y-0.025 or however far you need it to go to check the hole properly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in