[FL...] Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 what is the best way to get profile of a cone. Im assuming i need to create a free form surface from the cone, how do i do this the correct way? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ri...] Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 Surface Profile will allow you to use a Cone without the need of FFS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[FL...] Posted April 11 Author Share Posted April 11 I can’t do surface profile of the cone to AB, it needs 3 datum’s, but print is to AB. A is a plane, B is a cylinder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ri...] Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 You can, you will need to use the Datum B as the Tertiary as well. But please let me know if the Cone is Concentric to Datum B. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ri...] Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 The thing to keep in mind is that the "trick" I posted above only works if a Best-Fit isn't required. So if the Cone is supposed to be Concentric to B and Perpendicular to A, then most likely no Best Fit is required, unless you are needing to allow translation between the Cone and Datum A. If you need Best-Fitting then you will need to either use the new GD&T engine, or use a Free-Form surface in the legacy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[FL...] Posted April 11 Author Share Posted April 11 The cone is on the opposite side of datumB the cylinder, so it would be concentric I assume Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[To...] Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 If you create a Freeform Surface, Profile will let you use A and B only. Create Freeform Surface from Special Geometries, recall feature points from Cone. Select cone surface from CAD model. OK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[FL...] Posted April 11 Author Share Posted April 11 Thanks all, I appreciate it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ky...] Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 As stated above by others, there are ways around needing to do this as a freeform. They are discussed in this knowledge base document: https://portal.zeiss.com/knowledge-base?id=868503 Alternatively, if you are running 2023 or 2024, I believe this is no longer necessary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in