Jump to content

Hole Diameter Patterns


---
 Share

Recommended Posts

---

I am was wondering for any direction with this? I have many hole patterns that i have checked and they range between .0005"-.001" on position. The only thing that matters is the pattern not the outside of the plate. I am getting a drift from 0,0 to the end of plate on the last diameter taken. It starts out at nominal but is out of position .001" at the end? Thank you for any help with this, much appreciated.

Hole Pattern Drift.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

---

Please sign in to view this quote.

Yes, thats exactly it. Best fit Bore Pattern is being used and the Gauss is the filter being used. I see the example that you have attached that says using Gauss is used for dialing in the machine process and the Minimum Error Best Fit and the View Tolerance Best Fit are the best to use for the pattern. I was always using the Gauss and maybe that is what is throwing off the diameters or floating off position. This is a Best fit/Functional hole pattern to itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

---

Please sign in to view this quote.

Please sign in to view this username.

 Are you able to verify your findings with another measurement system (like vision system etc)? What about your measurement aren't you confident about?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

---

Please sign in to view this quote.

I know that the CMM can hold .0005" hole position on a 36" flat plate from beginning to end. I have ran the same plate on the other CMM and it repeats measurements. I don't usually compare one to the other. When the operator uses the probe in the machine they get within .0002" at the end of pattern. This has been ongoing with bosses and why the CMM uses up all the tolerance end to end. I just feel that there is something i can do differently and i cant pinpoint it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

---

Please sign in to view this quote.

Please sign in to view this username.

 Make your rotation a 3d line recalled from hole1 and hole2 and project that line to the top face and make sure the direction for rotation is correct (I am assuming +X). Last time you qualified the probe? Sigma values?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

---

Please sign in to view this quote.

That is how i have my Rotation set up. Thats another reason why im not getting that it is moving that much. I qualify 3 times a week, sigma value .00001"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

---

Please sign in to view this quote.

Please sign in to view this username.

 I thought you were using a non projected 2d line? Any possibility of shanking? Single points vs scanning?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

---

Technically, the 3d Line doesn't have to be projected to the top plane as it is ONLY controlling rotation about the Z axis.  You can, if you want to but it won't change the results.

Edited
Link to comment
Share on other sites

---

Please sign in to view this quote.

My apologies i am using a 3D Line for my rotation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

---

Please sign in to view this quote.

Please sign in to view this username.

 Correct. I do it out of habit in Calypso and other inspection software.

  • Like! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...