[Do...] Posted August 11 Share Posted August 11 How do I correct the vector direction of these arrows so that they show on the screen as being perpendicular to the edge they are measuring to? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Da...] Posted August 11 Share Posted August 11 Looks like points taken with a Renishaw touch-trigger probe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Do...] Posted August 11 Author Share Posted August 11 Please sign in to view this quote. Yes, it is a Renishaw PH10M head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ri...] Posted August 11 Share Posted August 11 (edited) Edit the "Norm Angle". Looks like it should be 270. Edited August 11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted August 11 Share Posted August 11 Please sign in to view this quote. Norm angle is correct - at least it should be 0 or 360 - it's telling in which direction is Z axis of feature pointing. Green arrows are measured points - are those recalled measured points? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Do...] Posted August 11 Author Share Posted August 11 Please sign in to view this quote. No, the actual direction that the probe travels is perpendicular to the edge that it is measuring. It is just the on-screen image that shows the vector as being off. Not sure why it shows different than it actually travels. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ca...] Posted August 12 Share Posted August 12 In evaluation what type of point is set? My guess is you will want plane point and it looks like touch point could be set. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Do...] Posted August 12 Author Share Posted August 12 Please sign in to view this quote. I am not sure what you mean....................... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Cl...] Posted August 12 Share Posted August 12 (edited) Is the line constructed from two points? Or is it a measured line feature? If constructed from two points, go into the evaluation settings of each point and change it in the drop-down on the lower right. Edited August 12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Do...] Posted August 12 Author Share Posted August 12 Please sign in to view this quote. I have attached a screenshot of the feature. It is a 2D line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted August 12 Share Posted August 12 What is that "Line Auto Path"? I saw a normal one, where you can define own start/length of a path. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Do...] Posted August 12 Author Share Posted August 12 Please sign in to view this quote. The "Line Auto Path" is what is in the measurement "Strategy". Instead of it being two individual points it is shown as a "Line Auto Path" but since the machine is not capable of scanning, the line is comprised of two points with a step width of .102" in between them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted August 12 Share Posted August 12 Please sign in to view this quote. In normal one you can also choose to have points only. But i highly doubt this will have any impact on shown vectors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Da...] Posted August 12 Share Posted August 12 It would be interesting to see a circle with 8 points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Do...] Posted August 12 Author Share Posted August 12 Please sign in to view this quote. Here is a circle from the same program. It has the same issue. The probe physically travels in the correct direction (normal to the surface) but on screen the actual points shown appear normal to the X,Y,Z coordinate system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Dr...] Posted August 12 Share Posted August 12 Hi Please sign in to view this username. , which version of Calypso and service pack are you running? You've mentioned it's an older one from before the era of caliper distances. You can find this information on the lower-right corner of the main menu or under the "?" dropdown > "About". There were some Calypso versions where service patches were released to address normal vector display errors through the ACIS engine. ACIS is like the graphical renderer for Calypso and though it's technically "its own thing," it's very closely intertwined with Calypso. If an ACIS bug is the source of this issue rather than anything in the programming approach, the solution could be as simple as getting a service patch. If you're already up-to-date on your version though, it could be an uphill battle. For one, very old Calypso versions are out of official support, and second, knowledge of how ACIS and Calypso interact isn't something that very many people have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Do...] Posted August 12 Author Share Posted August 12 Please sign in to view this quote. I am running Version 5.6.0000 (26.07.2013) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Dr...] Posted August 12 Share Posted August 12 Please sign in to view this quote. Interesting, that might give us a path forward. On the first service pack for that version (5.6.0400, don't ask me why Zeiss does their service pack numbering the way they do), there was a bugfix entitled "10504: CAD Model vector corrected". If that is indeed what you need, it'll have been implemented in every 5.6 service pack after 5.6.04; ideally we can get you up to the fully updated one, which I think is 5.6.24. The next question is where to get that service pack, and admittedly I'm at a loss here. It's not on the Zeiss Portal, but I'm willing to bet someone within (or without) Zeiss has a copy. If you don't get a response from a Zeissian here, I'd recommend reaching out about getting it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Do...] Posted August 12 Author Share Posted August 12 Please sign in to view this quote. Thanks for your help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Da...] Posted August 12 Share Posted August 12 My guess is that the Renishaw touch-trigger probe is causing the problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ha...] Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 Please sign in to view this quote. What Caitlin was referring to is the point evaluation mode. You will find that in the Evaluation window for the feature. You can switch between the different modes depending on the application. https://portal.zeiss.com/knowledge-base?id=1007796 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Jo...] Posted August 19 Share Posted August 19 Joseph, I really appreciate you posting that knowledge base article. I didn't know it existed, and it really helps to understand the different types of points. I do have a couple questions though, and I see that you wrote the article. So, who better to ask? Plane Point is described as 'stylus radius correction in the normal vector direction' but doesn't specify nominal normal or actual normal. It would have to be the nominal normal, correct? The point labeled as plane point is shown where the actual normal intersects with the actual contour, but would the actual result be where the nominal normal intersects with the actual contour? Also, I don't fully understand the description of a touch point. My interpretation is this: stylus radius correction will be in the direction of a coordinate system axis. If the probing vector matches the vector of a coordinate system axis, that will be the direction of the radius correction. If the probing vector does not match a system axis, the software will determine the coordinate system axis that is closest to the probing direction and radius correction will be in the direction of that system axis? Is that a correct interpretation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Da...] Posted August 19 Share Posted August 19 I don't think that the evaluation setting for a single point has any effect on straight lines and circles. Looking at Donny Fraser's measurement results, the vector correction seems to work well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted August 19 Share Posted August 19 I think this will be either software issue as Please sign in to view this username. stated or communication with head and Calypso. If that's a real measured feature, then vectors should be correct. If it would be recalled measured points, then it could behave in some circumstances. I would try install / obtain patch or newer software. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ro...] Posted August 19 Share Posted August 19 Please sign in to view this quote. Please sign in to view this quote. Donny, I have Service Pack 5.6.04, 5.6.08, 5.6.12, 5.6.16. Let me know if you want them and I'll send it to you via PM. Also, if anyone else needs one, I have Service Packs going back to Calypso 3.8 (2003). 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in