[Ra...] Posted Friday at 11:18 AM Share Posted Friday at 11:18 AM We had a program with a mini plan using an in-process, non-finalized name. We have updated the title of the mini plan and ran new data. All characteristic names, nominals and tolerances are the same. Is there a way to transfer the measurement data from the older "out of date" mini plan to the new current one with the updated name? We just want to compare our past results with the current. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ri...] Posted Friday at 04:24 PM Share Posted Friday at 04:24 PM I think the only way to use "Subsequent Evaluation" is if the feature names are identical. Characteristic names may be changed. If feature names are not the same in the zmp file, they will not associate to the new feature and or characteristic. As for the Mini Plan, it can be named anything, you select it at run time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ra...] Posted Friday at 07:51 PM Author Share Posted Friday at 07:51 PM If I were to use subsequent evaluation, would that keep the original headers, timestamps, date, etc? Or would I have to re input those for each zmp? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[ja...] Posted Friday at 08:40 PM Share Posted Friday at 08:40 PM it's too late to do this now since you've already got new data, but in the future you can quickly transfer the previous measurement database using this method: https://portal.zeiss.com/knowledge-base?id=1412026 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in