[Ra...] Posted August 15 Share Posted August 15 We had a program with a mini plan using an in-process, non-finalized name. We have updated the title of the mini plan and ran new data. All characteristic names, nominals and tolerances are the same. Is there a way to transfer the measurement data from the older "out of date" mini plan to the new current one with the updated name? We just want to compare our past results with the current. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ri...] Posted August 15 Share Posted August 15 I think the only way to use "Subsequent Evaluation" is if the feature names are identical. Characteristic names may be changed. If feature names are not the same in the zmp file, they will not associate to the new feature and or characteristic. As for the Mini Plan, it can be named anything, you select it at run time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ra...] Posted August 15 Author Share Posted August 15 If I were to use subsequent evaluation, would that keep the original headers, timestamps, date, etc? Or would I have to re input those for each zmp? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[ja...] Posted August 15 Share Posted August 15 it's too late to do this now since you've already got new data, but in the future you can quickly transfer the previous measurement database using this method: https://portal.zeiss.com/knowledge-base?id=1412026 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in