[Ri...] Posted Wednesday at 12:00 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 12:00 PM I don't think I have ever seen angularity with a modifier, is this legit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ri...] Posted Wednesday at 12:51 PM Author Share Posted Wednesday at 12:51 PM Edit: Is the Tolerance for angularity in degrees or radians? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ri...] Posted Wednesday at 02:20 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 02:20 PM Please sign in to view this username. Angularity is not a tolerance on the angle. It is simply Perpendicularity, but instead of applied 90°, it can be any angle. They most likely want Position as this appears to be incorrectly toleranced. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ri...] Posted Wednesday at 02:28 PM Author Share Posted Wednesday at 02:28 PM I'm pushing for a Profile of the feature. My understanding of angularity tolerance is two parallel planes to constrain the feature, similar to profile but less control. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ri...] Posted Wednesday at 02:51 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 02:51 PM https://www.gdandtbasics.com/angularity/ It is orientation only, so you'd have to be careful with Profile. It can also be applied to cylindrical tolerance zones as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[na...] Posted Thursday at 06:04 AM Share Posted Thursday at 06:04 AM Please sign in to view this quote. ISO will allow material modifiers on features of size. But I assume you are working with ASME, where I'm not sure it's the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted Thursday at 06:46 AM Share Posted Thursday at 06:46 AM Is that tolerance really in degrees? It should be a number just like in parallelism Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[na...] Posted Thursday at 06:54 AM Share Posted Thursday at 06:54 AM Please sign in to view this quote. I vote for that tolerance must not be in degrees. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ri...] Posted Thursday at 10:34 AM Author Share Posted Thursday at 10:34 AM Please sign in to view this quote. Yes, it is in degrees. 🤣 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted Thursday at 10:49 AM Share Posted Thursday at 10:49 AM Then it's wrong. On drawing there should be basic dimension of angle and in this callout should be number of tolerance width same like for flatness or parallelism. You can not use MMC value ( typicaly of some distance ) and add that to an angle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Pa...] Posted Thursday at 03:03 PM Share Posted Thursday at 03:03 PM Poor drawing. I see so much more of this from our customers than we used to. It's like suddenly design engineers around the world are all under 30, and all guessing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in