[Ri...] Posted Thursday at 06:14 PM Share Posted Thursday at 06:14 PM Is there any way of knowing that the measurement was handled as a subsequent evaluation? I know that I could leverage the serial number of the machine if it was done on an offline seat (look for 00000), but I don't think that applies to subsequent evaluation on a live machine. It's possible to maybe just leverage the incremental part number to see if it ends with "_SE", but I'd like to hear if there is a more concrete way. Any and all help is greatly appreciated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted Thursday at 06:23 PM Share Posted Thursday at 06:23 PM I have time of a measurement on protocol. When reevaluated, then time is zero. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ch...] Posted Friday at 12:11 AM Share Posted Friday at 12:11 AM Please sign in to view this quote. usually the way I can tell as well when time is < 1 min, etc. I'll see if there is some PCM Flag we can check as well.. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post [An...] Posted Friday at 03:34 PM Popular Post Share Posted Friday at 03:34 PM (edited) Edit: *** Unless you're determining a previous run was a subsequent evaluation... then I'm out to lunch! Hah! *** This should get you going: if getRunMode("subsequentEvaluation") then // handle subsequent evaluation endif Edited Friday at 03:35 PM 5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ri...] Posted Friday at 04:23 PM Author Share Posted Friday at 04:23 PM Please sign in to view this username. Well that was super simple. Looks like I should have just read the user manual. Lol. Thank you so very much! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in