[Ru...] Posted Thursday at 07:54 AM Share Posted Thursday at 07:54 AM Hello I was checking the GD&T parallelism of a plane against a Datum D, and when I get the maximum and minimum labels it’s a strange information For minimum label shows (-0,397) that match with colour map, but the value for maximum label (+0,397) doesn’t corresponds with colour map :In other pieces Obviously the parallelism m is the range between maxim and minimum value, and as both are the same, in first example below these means 0,397 + 0,397 = 0,794 And I see the same issue in other parts: the maximum and minimum value is always these absolute value, just changing the + or – seymbol …. an sound very strange th always the min and max value are the same value in all pieces , I dont belive it I think that something is missing for me to get this max/min labels Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted Thursday at 08:19 AM Share Posted Thursday at 08:19 AM It is representing plane in mid position so you see both numbers the same. It's just visualisation. Software can not tell if you want to see only 0 and +deviation or -deviation and 0 - so it's placing to middle of deviation to show color map. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ru...] Posted Thursday at 08:59 AM Author Share Posted Thursday at 08:59 AM Thanks Martin But the logical way for a clear understanding for a parallelism value 0,794 is get a maximum label = 0,251(as example) and as minimum the label -0,543 (as example) so the range = l0,251l +l0,543l = 0,794 So with that information we can see where and how much material we need to add or delete on each area to get a correct parallelism And I see the same behaviour for flatness of a plane, where the maximum and minim values indicated in labels are the same values ALWAYS so we cannot know how much material we need to add or to delete to correct it in worst points. I could understand the in those hose cases the flatness or parallelism we can the biggest absolute value between maxim and min label (to assure that from a theoretical mid position we get plan all plane points inside) but the current min / max label representation has no sense because always one out of them, will show a wrong value and bring confusion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted Thursday at 09:08 AM Share Posted Thursday at 09:08 AM (edited) IF you want to show MIN and MAX, then don't do it on paralellism but try model comparison with selected faces ( triangles ) - it will show you MIN/MAX in selected alignment and with correct height. Paralellism does not contain refference of height/distance Edited Thursday at 09:09 AM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in