[Ga...] Posted yesterday at 04:32 PM Share Posted yesterday at 04:32 PM Unsure if I can share photos, I'll do my best to describe the situation. First, I've been doing this for almost 6 years. In that time, I have never once had a good grasp on profile, and have mostly learned everything I know on the job from my mentor outside of taking Calypso basic and advanced at Zeiss in 2021 (meaning I may not understand all 'proper' technical terminology). This month is my first month without a mentor and I am now the 'senior' metrologist at my company with nobody to ask any Calypso questions to. I've deeply feared the day I will come across profile again, and of course our first big project after the staffing change has 5 profile callouts and only one with a full DRF of ABC. Any help explaining anything to do with Calypso 8.0 profile techniques would be greatly appreciated!! The new GDT engine makes even less sense to me than the old one. Here's the situation: Print has a full DRF of A being a plane in XY, B being a line along Y, and C being a line along X. They want a profile of a plane that is parallel to datum A and the callout is to datum A only. I know that unfilled alignment elements refer to the BA, which is already comprised of the print DRF. However, I feel like if they wanted it to ABC they would have called it out as being to ABC instead of specifically A? Obviously a plane parallel to the measured feature is not going to constrain much and Calypso makes it clear that just datum A is insufficient. From what I've read here, it looks like I can use alignments and constraints to achieve this profile. Unfortunately, I don't really understand how to do that and I think I am missing basic information that would make the posts about this that already exist clearer to me. I have little (basically zero) experience with freeform, and even less experience with using alignments outside of a standard local alignment. I have seen programs written with constraints applied to radii <180° to get a better radius value, but I have never understood what that is doing. I am unsure if checking a translation/rotation XYZ constraint means it IS constraining that axis or if it is NOT constraining the checked axis. I think in this case I would want to constrain translation along X and Y and rotation around Z, but I don't even know where it would be appropriate to do that (Measurement plane? Datum plane? Geometry best fit alignment? Is it datum A that I would put into the geometry best fit alignment or the profile measurement plane? What is the air-speed velocity of an unladen swallow?) I got blindsided with this huge expedited project Thursday of last week, and I have until the end of the first full week of January to make this CT program happen. Today's my last day in until Jan 5, so I am under a huge time crunch and don't have time to play around with this until I feel comfortable with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted yesterday at 05:28 PM Share Posted yesterday at 05:28 PM Your profile callout to only datum A is just a parallelism - which should give you same result as your profile callout. Are you working with ISO or ASME ( difference would be printed result ). I think new GD&T should give you a result with only A used, but i think you can make it with alignments like this: make fully defined alignment ( ABC ) use this alignment as your feature's alignment ( open feature and on right side there is usually choosed "base alignment" open evaluation tab check bestfit translation only in Z ( i think rotation in Z is useless ) save this bestfit as an alignment use this bestfit alignment in your profile callout And again - it should give you same result as parallelism Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in