[Ja...] Posted Monday at 09:16 PM Share Posted Monday at 09:16 PM Just out of curiosity, I’m wondering what the smallest sigma value people use before you consider it to be to the point where you’re eliminating too much data. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Lu...] Posted Wednesday at 12:38 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 12:38 PM My filters are set for plus/minus 3 sigma Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Pa...] Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago I've never considered using sigma for this. I'm not sure there's an answer. I mean scan a circle with a gazillion points with any attenuation settings, then come back in and take 5 discrete points at the same location. They will both have sigma values. They will both report different results. I can't use S to determine which is correct. I know the 5-point method threw away no points. Maybe use the S value of this as your target? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ke...] Posted 18 hours ago Share Posted 18 hours ago I think I remember someone stating thet a Features Sigma value should be about 25% of it's Form... but IDK where one would go from there. I'm more of a visual person, so I always "show masked actual points" when I'm programming, and I plot roundness & flatness for important features so that I can see if there is too much filtering Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in