[Al...] Posted Tuesday at 08:24 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 08:24 PM Hello all, I am confused about the effect of a position control with only one datum reference. In the attached example, Datum B has a positional control only referencing Datum A while another hole of the same size has three Datum references. I am trying to create a CMM program to inspect both of these positional tolerances, however, the position of Datum B is highly variable and has poor repeatability. What is the positional tolerance on Datum B actually controlling? Does it make sense that the CMM program would struggle to repeat this measurement reliably? Any thoughts/ input is appreciated. Thanks! GD&T_Question.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Jo...] Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago Datums consume all possible degrees of freedom. In this case datum A is only consuming Rotation in X and Y. Translation in X and Y and Z are not constrained (This is effectively the same as perpendicularity) Since there are no basics, Wherever that hole lies *is* your datum B. It can lie anywhere on the surface as long as its perpendicular to the datum A hole. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ch...] Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago Joe is correct. You need to remember that position callouts control position AND orientation. It seems the designer intends to control the orientation of both cylinders to each other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in