[Br...] Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago I’m looking for input from anyone who has implemented an iterative bore-measurement approach in Calypso 2022 that isolates the lands only when establishing a datum from a rifled barrel. On our previous Hexagon CMMs (PC-DMIS, non-scanning), we established the primary datum feature from the lands by measuring a 4-point circle. After the initial measurement, we used an IF/THEN routine: If the measured diameter fell outside a defined range (indicating contact on grooves), the alignment would rotate by a set increment. The circle would then be remeasured. This loop continued until all four contact points landed only on the lands. That resulting circle defined the bore diameter. We repeated the process at the opposite end of the barrel and constructed the datum axis from those two circles. With our Zeiss machines, we’re currently scanning and using a maximum inscribed circle to define the bore. While this works, I’m interested in recreating something closer to the iterative “land-only” approach described above—ideally using Calypso logic, PCM, or another built-in method. Has anyone done something similar in Calypso 2022? Specifically: Rotating an alignment iteratively based on measured diameter feedback Forcing point selection to land features only Or scripting a looped remeasurement routine to converge on a land-derived circle Any guidance, examples, or best-practice suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago Most of it only with PCM to have a comfort. For others you have to do much of a work by copying features and so on. I would recommend using base alignment to have iterative result and better / safer definitions of nominal paths / points to scan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ze...] Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago How about using maximum/minimum coordinate on your scanned circle to find the high/low spots. Then use that info to refine subsequent alignments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Cl...] Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago (edited) What about using fixturing to physically clock the geometry? This would allow for an alignment on one of the lands. I would think this would allow you to scan only the surfaces you needed. We do something very similar here. Physically clocking some very complex geometry so we can avoid certain surfaces to measure Datum circles. Edited 1 hour ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in