[Ma...] Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago Howdy, was wondering if anyone knew of a reason as to why i get these weird curly results for runouts. the other side looks great. scan direction for feature is the same for datum cylinder. is this a projection issue? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted 10 hours ago Share Posted 10 hours ago Are you concerned about value or graphics? Graphical issue is only magnification of deviations - can be changed in total runout characteristic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted 9 hours ago Author Share Posted 9 hours ago (edited) The value and graphics, I increased the error scaling for the post. "E side" looks great and looking at the manufactures report they seem to get a better result than i do (0.074) graphics also looks better. I would like to understand what the graphics are telling me when i see this loop. tends to happen often. Is this just normal or is something happening within? Both bores are 200mm and 30mm depth same measurement strategy, using the same datum bore. Edited 9 hours ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[To...] Posted 9 hours ago Share Posted 9 hours ago Please sign in to view this username. I don't know if this is your problem but I see this happen whenever a probe shanks out at one point on the diameter. However, I wouldn't necessarily see equal amounts on the and bottom. I would expect to see a greater deviation at the bottom. I call that the "uvula" effect. You won't see the uvula until you increase the magnification, like you did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in