Jump to content

Recommended Posts

---

Hello Gustavo,

In my opinion, it doesn't make much sense to analyze a cylinder here. The measurable surface area is too small—less than a quarter of the cylinder.
The actual measurements of the radius and the position of the axis obtained in this way are, in my opinion, not very meaningful.
Since the target dimensions 4.8, R22.5, and 51.3 are TED values, I would only analyze the measurable lateral surface (patch as a surface) and evaluate that.

If you still have deviations, please also check the datums again to make sure they were all calculated and selected correctly.

Franz

×
×
  • Create New...