Can I output tableprotocol to excel?

[[Ca...]]

Possible to output tableprotocol to excel?

[[Ri...]]

https://portal.zeiss.com/knowledge-base?id=513250

[[Ca...]]

Please sign in to view this quote.

Wow thanks. Will try it out.

[[Re...]]

Please sign in to view this quote.

Hey , ich kann die Seite öffnen aber wird nichts angezeigt bzw Fehlermeldung "Seite nicht gefunden" 

Ist die Hilfedatei entfernt worden?

Danke 

[[Je...]]

Yes, you can do this using

Please sign in to view this username.

's  knowledge base article.

Another route is to work directly with the the .chr, .fet, and .hdr table files. We do this to send the data to QC-Calc, and it can also be imported to Excel.

Prolink QC-Calc

Both are less painful than trying to create a custom report in PiWeb.

Edited yesterday at 05:46 PM

[[Ri...]]

Oh no. Not QC-Calc. 

Just an FYI - you can also just directly export data out of PiWeb Reporting Plus without the need of a modified PiWeb Report. Though - saying QC-CALC is less painful than simply dropping in a Measurement Table, and a button is a far stretch. 

[[Ch...]]

Please sign in to view this quote.

WATCH YOUR MOUTH RICHARD .   Just kidding by the way

I love my QC Calc.

For this, it will depend on what your goals are.  For a single part from a single cmm, then great, use PiWeb.  But if you want to combine data from multiple cmm's then they want you to buy the SBS version.  That turns PiWeb into P$Web real quick.  Or P€Web for my European folks.  

[[Ri...]]

I used QC-Calc many years ago when PiWeb didn't exist and I needed to data crunch a lot of CMM data (and I had been previously hand typing it). It was a great solution at the time, but as soon as PiWeb came out, we went that direction and never looked back. QC-Calc pretty quickly got messy with keeping data nice-and-tidy (I remember the big thing was it kept databases together based upon number of characteristics, so it was a mess if you ran via current selection or mini-plans).