[Zo...] Posted yesterday at 06:11 PM Share Posted yesterday at 06:11 PM i am sure i have seen this discussed here before,, but can not find the topic here is my issue drawing is asking for Profile tolerance regardless of any Datum the feature is a cone "Profile of line" has the option of "No Datum Feature", but you can't select a cone "Profile" doesn't offer to the same option I tried to use the same feature as Primary Datum, but it can not calculate it (purple) only thing that gave me any result was when i created "Geometry Best Fit" using the same feature (Cone) and use that as datum reference However, i am not certain if this is correct i was hoping someone here can either confirm or have a better solution Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted yesterday at 06:40 PM Share Posted yesterday at 06:40 PM If you have FreeForm, then recall measured data on that surface and select no datum reference. Otherwise you can use Form with doubled value. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ro...] Posted yesterday at 08:47 PM Share Posted yesterday at 08:47 PM For the top tier, you need to create a sub-alignment with -CB- then create a geometry best-fit relative to the sub-alignment, enter the cone feature, then click evaluation constraints and apply the appropriate constraints. You would then use the Geometry best fit as your datum reference frame in the profile characteristic. For the bottom tier, Enter the Cone as the feature as well as all (3) datums but be sure to change the evaluation of the datums to "minimum feature". 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Jo...] Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago This is not a composite control frame, it should be treated as two separate DRF's. In this case the bottom DRF to no datums would just be FORM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ro...] Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago This is treating it as two separate DRF's. This is straight from Uncle Carl. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago (edited) Please sign in to view this username. I was testing a cylinder a time ago, where i compared profile of cylinder with filled datums of that feature against profile of FF - same measured points ( either one was recalled into another ) and results were very different. Edited 6 hours ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ro...] Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago Please sign in to view this username. Did they both have the same evaluation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago Please sign in to view this username. I think i have used restriction for radius, then Gauss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in