[po...] Posted 13 hours ago Share Posted 13 hours ago Which is better to use for runout datum a cylinder or a 3D line recalled from two circles measured in the cylinder. The a 3D line seems to give lower numbers than a cylinder. Is due to the cylinder axis is extend out forever and a 3D line is only the length from circle to circle? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted 12 hours ago Share Posted 12 hours ago Datum A is evaluated as outer tangential. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[RP...] Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago Please sign in to view this quote. So what you're saying is, per print, Datum -A- should be a cylinder with OT eval instead, not LSQ eval for the runout callout? I assumed short cylinders would be better evaluated as 3d lines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted 10 hours ago Share Posted 10 hours ago Please sign in to view this username. I'm just saying how is this cylinder treated as a datum in any callout. This datum looks like 1:1 ratio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Da...] Posted 9 hours ago Share Posted 9 hours ago ASME or ISO? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted 9 hours ago Share Posted 9 hours ago Please sign in to view this username. in both Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Lu...] Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago Please sign in to view this quote. Yes in ISO you have the ISO 5459 that establish in other stuff DATUM and the evaluation for datum is like ASME outer tangengial. not LSQ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in