Jump to content

GD&T Position


---
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,
We are frequently encountering measurement‑related questions. Many junior customers keep referring to various international standards such as ISO standards.
 
Our Calypso software has already been configured for ISO‑compliant evaluation.
I would like to clarify: when evaluating the position tolerance of a hole, is Gaussian (least‑squares) fitting the default method according to ISO requirements?
 
Which ISO standard and specific clause defines this rule?

image.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is ISO compliant.

Datums are tangential, but measured feature is Gauss.

I think only difference about ASME and ISO will be in that feature's evaluation.

  • Like! 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to view this quote.

Sorry, I would like to know which part of the ISO standard defines this? I have searched for a long time but have not found any clear specification.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to view this username.

Hi and sorry, i have no document about this.

But years on forum and work on machines can give a clue how it is.
My main knowledge was with using ZEISS Inspect, where i can easily visually see how is ISO, ASME and GEOMETRY behaving.

Many hints were from

Please sign in to view this username.

 and his drawings and simulations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...