GD&T: Material Requirements

[[Ri...]]

Please, please, please stop this behaviour. 

 

[[Ra...]]

Hello, 

Please share this request to the My Voice portal. 

https://portal.zeiss.com/my-voice/software/metrology

[[Ri...]]

Please sign in to view this quote.

I have requested multiple things for Inspect, but I do not see any feedback from Zeiss. 

These were posted all the way back in 2024. 

https://portal.zeiss.com/my-voice/software/metrology/product/eaafdea8-9296-485d-82c1-cc6d1ca0eca2/request/c3051e15-87d9-436b-a489-1b142d7d6559

https://portal.zeiss.com/my-voice/software/metrology/product/eaafdea8-9296-485d-82c1-cc6d1ca0eca2/request/f0335067-2822-4b52-8912-fd2c2f43d696

[[Ri...]]

And to add to the confusion: what exactly is out?????????

 

[[Ch...]]

Regarding your last post.

The linear size check do not measured the virtual condition, due to the fact

* for datum B your linear size check do ignore the perpendicular constraint to datum A

* for datum C your linear size check do ignore the perpendicular constraint to datum A and the distance constraint to datum B

We are quite sure that we compute the virtual condition quite exact but if your sure that there is really a computation mistake please contact your local support contact.

 

Regarding your first post:

Due to the fact that MMR computation is the simulation of a gauge, you have to check if it possible to put a virtual gauge (based on your nominal sizes) into your drills (or bolts). If this failed the error message appears. We don't see how it should possible to provide a standard conform datum system without this check (and the error message if this check is failed).

Of course, we could and should think about more user feedback what exactly is going wrong. This is already on our list for further improvements.