[Th...] Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago I’m measuring the true position of two threaded holes using the legacy true position with datum B primary and A secondary. The Y results vary, but the reported Z location is measuring zero. Nominal location being zero. When I switch from a diametral Y/Z tolerance zone to a polar zone, Z variation appears but the drawing does not specify a projected tolerance so I don’t want that. I also changed a feature’s nominal Z from 0 to 0.100 as a test, and its actual Z then reported 0.1000. Anyone know why this is happening? Given the datum structure, rotation is free so is Calypso forcing the feature to the perfect zero? If so, is this ok to leave like this? Note: I’ve also tried using a bore pattern and freeing the rotation. When I do there is variation in both Y and Z but of course TP results significantly increase since there is now another variable to include in the error. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Jo...] Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago Hi Thomas, sounds like you only got a point (centerpoint circle) and not a zylinder. Thats why you only get the options circular tolerance zone (2d) or spherical (3d). You would need (if there is a "Ø" in the tolerance field) a cylindrical tolerance zone and therefor a cylinder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in