GOM ATOS SCANBOX 8 SERIES SCAN QUALITY

[[Uz...]]

Hi, 

I am facing few difficulties to be able to capture a smooth scan around the radius/closures. 

I am using the GAP & FLUSH principles for edge/surface points. 

The scan around the radius is not well defined, it also seems to be bridging between closures. 

 

I have tried with following settings but the result does not seems to improve. 

1. Scan with HDR+ Resolution 

2. Scan with reflection detection

3. Changes parameters to avoid usage of points on groove. 

 

Can you please share your past experience if you have dealt with similar issue. 

 

Many Thanks

[[Ra...]]

To improve your scans around radii and closures, consider reducing scan speed and increasing point density for better detail capture. Experiment with multi-sweep scanning and adjust the scan angle for optimal data collection. Ensure optimal lighting and surface preparation to minimize reflections, and utilize post-processing techniques to filter noise and remove bridging issues. Additionally, revisit your GAP & FLUSH settings and consult user manuals for any further information. 

[[Ja...]]

Please sign in to view this username.

 i think some advice youve given here is related to the tscan hawk approach to scanning , whereas the title is referring to a scanbox , so will be an atos sensor variant.

Please sign in to view this username.

 i suspect this is due to the gap being very small and the edges being thin i comparison to your meas volume and most likelt the surface fi ish.

Reflection detection quite unlikely to help much. I would suggest not using automatic exposure settings and experimenting with angle of approach.  You could attempt manually masking areas from other scans that are not aimed at this feature. In my experience this might need consultation with your local ae on investigating what is possible..it looks like for the combination of factors mentioned You may be at the limit of what is actually viable.

[[Ra...]]

Good idea

Please sign in to view this username.