[Ma...] Posted August 28 Share Posted August 28 Hi fellows, is there a way to implement this without newer "Two cylinders" feature? I am not sure if this callout even make sense. Base C is placed on dimension of two cylinders as symmetry. Where on earth is (M) applicable for this base? I would agree that diameters of those cylinders would make a (M) in symmetry base callout more sense then it's symmetry. Some data ( in mm, all cylinders are ID ): Two cylinders are like grooves - whole part from side makes an "E" shape Tolerance on diameters: +0,13/-0,00 Tolerance on distance of cylinders: +0,13/-0,13 Symmetry of a threaded cylinder: 0,6 Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ri...] Posted August 28 Share Posted August 28 Have you tried this in the new GD&T package? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Da...] Posted August 28 Share Posted August 28 Please sign in to view this quote. No, because it's still beta :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ma...] Posted August 28 Author Share Posted August 28 Sorry guys - i am still at 2017 - god knows how long i'll strugle with IT and new PC ( we have one machine with one pc ). I've sent twice pc specifications for win10 system - i still get HP workstation system with K processor and PSU beast ( what a waste of money ). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ri...] Posted August 28 Share Posted August 28 Please sign in to view this quote. It's pretty damn solid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in