Jump to content

Curve seems a bit off.


---
 Share

Recommended Posts

Are you working in inch? I ran into something like this before. The translation value were in metric. The probe radius value appears to be in metric. The scale references is minch.....
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to view this quote.

Author knows that - he wrote that.
He asks why is on 2nd plot a graph - usually when you are too much off of nominal, then there is no data, but he see deviations.
In bestfit translation is used MM but he uses INCH - and 0,00077inch = 0,019558mm.

As Tom mentioned - inch and mm confusion.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
Here I go again. The vertical axis of this plot is labeled minch. I tried googling minch and came up with nothing related to numbers. If I am to believe it is microinch, the numbers on the left can't mean millionths. If I assume that minch is short milli inch or 1,000th of an inch, then that works. Is there a better term than minch? Or, make the label "inch" and display the values in thousandths, i.e. .004

I'm sorry we haven't adopted the metric system. I often tell people "We are converting to metric, inch by inch", but we still have a long way to go.

minch.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Horizontal scale is labeled Inch, In the lower right. Typically, I was told to keep the same units as much as possible. ( minch makes me laugh) 🤣
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used to tell people that the inch to metric conversion has been a problem for 25.4 years but, I've been around a bit more than twice that amount and it's still a problem for Calypso.. 🙄
It used to happen fairly often when I first started working with calypso but, to this date, it happens occasionally. Sometimes I just re-run the actuals and the report corrects itself. 😐
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...