[士哲...] Posted March 20, 2022 Share Posted March 20, 2022 How to detect the stacking thickness of the components? In the analysis of meat thickness, it is impossible to obtain the 3D nominal thickness of the components to compare the actual thickness of the grid!! ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Na...] Posted March 21, 2022 Share Posted March 21, 2022 Hello, you can create a material thickness on your nominal data and assign the measuring principle "referenced construction". An actual material thickness will be created. Then, you can check the nominal material thickness for "Material Thickness Comparison On Actual". This will result in a colored deviation between nominal and actual: https://techguide.gom.com/en/article/cmd_comparison_create_multiple_thickness_comparison_on_actual.html Regards, Nanno Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[士哲...] Posted March 23, 2022 Author Share Posted March 23, 2022 The single piece can be compared like this, but there is no way to analyze it in the assembly, there is no solution? We want to compare the abnormal thickness after assembly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[St...] Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 Guten Morgen, könnte man nicht zwei Schnitte anlegen und dann über Kontinuierlicher Kurvenabstand auswerten? Grüße Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[士哲...] Posted March 23, 2022 Author Share Posted March 23, 2022 Hi We want to use the thickness analysis function to quickly make analysis results, and use the color temperature method to find abnormal locations, but there is no way to analyze it in the assembly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Be...] Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 Hi, unfortunately there is no easy way to get the results you expect and for e.g. for CT measurements you would need that each of your assembly parts could be analyzed as a single assembly. What you can try as a workaround: Modify your CAD in GOMInspect that you remove patches from your assembly which couldn't be measured with an Atos Scanner. Simply select these patches and delete these patches. May be you need the 'Edit mode' of the CAD if the CAD is separated into different bodies to have a visual access to these patches. You can contact also your local GOM partner and supply the data. Then we would be able to determine if there are more efficient strategies. Hope this helps?! Regards, Bernd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[士哲...] Posted March 23, 2022 Author Share Posted March 23, 2022 Hi The merger of the CAD single piece may be a feasible plan, but this is not an efficient approach, especially in our product development process, more likely to make CAD errors, hope to break through, efficient analysis, this is urgent need . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in