[To...] Posted May 30, 2023 Share Posted May 30, 2023 Any thoughts on the best way to measure this? With the ±.01" tolerance in the example, I'm leaning towards using an Angularity with a .014" wide tolerance zone, but the issue becomes what to report because I'm guessing it would need to be a number between .04" and .06". Or would you just report the intersection values at each end of the actual line?Chamfer Spec.JPG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Jo...] Posted May 30, 2023 Share Posted May 30, 2023 A profile tolerance zone using origin intersection of planes should satisfy that. It would be a total width zone oriented as shown. Nominal geometry .050" chamfer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ke...] Posted May 31, 2023 Share Posted May 31, 2023 For the parts that I measure, we would only be looking for the intersection values; but the angles are not called out (just the "corner form" distances. The way this is called out, I would lean toward reporting the intersection values (0.5 +/- 0.1), and report the angle as reference if there is no general tolerance for angles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Er...] Posted May 31, 2023 Share Posted May 31, 2023 If you were wanting to evaluate this exactly like the interpretation, I would try measuring the intersecting point from one side and use it to create a theoretical line at the perfect 45-degree angle. Then, intersect it with the plane on the opposite side and measure these two intersecting points. I would do it for each side of the chamfer as shown in you interpretation. I'm not sure how easy this would be as I have not done this. Just an idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in