Jump to content

Chamfer Measurement


Recommended Posts

Any thoughts on the best way to measure this? With the ±.01" tolerance in the example, I'm leaning towards using an Angularity with a .014" wide tolerance zone, but the issue becomes what to report because I'm guessing it would need to be a number between .04" and .06". Or would you just report the intersection values at each end of the actual line?

Chamfer Spec.JPG

Link to comment
https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/7844-chamfer-measurement/
Share on other sites

For the parts that I measure, we would only be looking for the intersection values; but the angles are not called out (just the "corner form" distances. The way this is called out, I would lean toward reporting the intersection values (0.5 +/- 0.1), and report the angle as reference if there is no general tolerance for angles.
Link to comment
https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/7844-chamfer-measurement/#findComment-33976
Share on other sites

If you were wanting to evaluate this exactly like the interpretation, I would try measuring the intersecting point from one side and use it to create a theoretical line at the perfect 45-degree angle. Then, intersect it with the plane on the opposite side and measure these two intersecting points. I would do it for each side of the chamfer as shown in you interpretation. I'm not sure how easy this would be as I have not done this. Just an idea.
Link to comment
https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/topic/7844-chamfer-measurement/#findComment-33978
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...