Jump to content

GDT Question


---
 Share

Recommended Posts

163_ff8947f0c43e91c5642e306ca612c4ca.png

What do you guys think the tolerance if for the 25mm dimension on this snip?

Where I'm struggling is finding the clause or snip in Y14.5 that proves this.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A basic dimension has no tolerance, regardless of what the block tolerances are. It needs to be defined by a FCF or it's incomplete.

The FCF shown defines orientation, but not size.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand. But I'm trying to find a way to prove that using the standard.

Proving a negative is basically impossible; So I will need come up with a counterfactual as proof.

Anyone have any ideas?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only thing I note here is :

The parallelism clearly applies to the CL, I think we can agree, and therefore is only controlling orientation of the feature in concern.

There may be something else controlling it's size (profile general note, etc.)

Therefore it may be legit - probalby not the best or preffered way to tolerance it, but doable in Calypso anyway.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Much appreciated guys.

Luckily, there isn't a "how do I measure this" question that came up. My only goal is to find the most clear/effective verbiage to communicate that .1 is not controlling the distance.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...