[Da...] Posted September 12, 2022 Share Posted September 12, 2022 Keep getting a warning at the end of my run saying my probe is not qualified...it says probe #6 ,I only have one probe on that system ??? I have requalified several times. Any Clue? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[No...] Posted September 12, 2022 Share Posted September 12, 2022 Screenshot? Is it a XXT head? If you haven't already, try a full qualification. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ri...] Posted September 12, 2022 Share Posted September 12, 2022 Please sign in to view this quote. Do you have an end-park position that is referencing another stylus system? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Da...] Posted September 12, 2022 Author Share Posted September 12, 2022 Richard, I thought you had it, but no ,No end park position. I have requalified , It doesn't seem to affect the final results . I'm just going to put up with it, Its a giant 23 page report program for a one pc job. Thanks for the hints !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ri...] Posted September 12, 2022 Share Posted September 12, 2022 Please sign in to view this quote. Dang - alright. The last thing I could think of is to check inside of Resources - Features Settings Editor - Stylus System to see if a group or anything is referencing something bogus. I guess it is also possible for something to get corrupted in the sql database, so if you ever get time, you might delete the stylus system and remake it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Da...] Posted September 12, 2022 Author Share Posted September 12, 2022 Richard , That's the plan. checked stylus system, and stylus on all features. Everything looks good. First chance I get I'll delete the system and remake it ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Da...] Posted September 12, 2022 Share Posted September 12, 2022 I had a similar problem on an old program. I found an extra stylus system on the exchange Stylus system page, I changed it to the active system and the problem went away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Er...] Posted September 12, 2022 Share Posted September 12, 2022 When this happens in Calypso 5 I manually set the stylus system and stylus for all features under Feature Settings, no "Default." If I still have issues I use a text editor on the "inspection" file and manually fix it. 🙄 Usually this happens inside the strategy with more than one line. The first line gets changed, but not the rest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Da...] Posted September 13, 2022 Author Share Posted September 13, 2022 Totally erased the stylus system and rebuilt it ,changing the name slightly and ...... Still says not qualified. 🙄 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Jo...] Posted September 13, 2022 Share Posted September 13, 2022 Please sign in to view this quote. So nothing here ?stylus.JPG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Da...] Posted September 13, 2022 Author Share Posted September 13, 2022 Nope checked everything... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Jo...] Posted September 13, 2022 Share Posted September 13, 2022 Please sign in to view this quote. could there be a formula or something like getactual hidden or a construction or theoretical feature ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Ow...] Posted September 13, 2022 Share Posted September 13, 2022 You probably did but, just to make sure, be sure and select stylus, not stylus system. Stylus shows every probe used in the feature, where stylus system just shows the stylus name. If nothing in CMM Park, then I'd second what John said, probably in some PCM formula and if not construction or theoretical, in the pre or post parameters on the characteristics side, like to load a specific stylus for the next run or PCM system move?Stylus vs Stylus System.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Da...] Posted September 14, 2022 Author Share Posted September 14, 2022 Found it !! it was a rotation location for a different rotation.... I'm not rotating at all. We used a program from the previous guy ( it will be faster !). Not doing that again ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Da...] Posted September 14, 2022 Author Share Posted September 14, 2022 There really should be some sort of indicating boxes on the program somewhere to show that they are there !!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in